Poecase
Alienation
1304 days
since Child Protective Services declared the claim against the father as unsubstantiated.
since Child Protective Services declared the claim against the father as unsubstantiated.
Click Here to View CPS Decision
1500 days
since since Fayette County Family Court took the children from their father.
since since Fayette County Family Court took the children from their father.
1303 days
since the District Attorney dropped criminal charges against the father.
since the District Attorney dropped criminal charges against the father.
Click Here to View Dismissal
Poe Custody Case
This is a case of premeditated textbook alienation.
Video, audio, & documented evidence is provided throughout this site.
No History of Abuse
Original accusation is extremely questionable.
The ex-wife accused the father of slapping Jack, 7-years-old at the time, because his shoes were too tight. This accusation was made the VERY NEXT DAY after Jack told his dad that he and his sister were in a secret therapy and that his dad wasn't supposed to know.
The ex-wife picked Jack up within 2 hours of the supposed slap. Jack had no marks and did not say anything about being slapped to his mother, despite the fact that he had never been struck or spanked in his life.
The ex-wife testified that Jack told her the next evening in a waiting room immediately before the secret therapy session. This therapy was a weekly session in which the kids were instructed to say terrible things about their father. The coaching was so obvious that the therapist testified on the father's behalf. The ex-wife's story changed multiple times as her testimony in the EPO hearing did not match the EPO Report or the CPS Complaint.
The ex-wife testified that Jack simply "blurted out what happened excitedly", she stated that he said he was smacked while telling her "about his day". Jack has never been spanked in his life and he simply "blurted" this out and did so "excitedly"....? Also the mother is unemployed and Jack was not at school that day, they were home together, why would she ask him about his day?
Despite the fact that the ex-wife's story grew to her being so concerned that Jack could have experienced a "concussion" due to the alleged slap, as she stated on recorded audio to Detective Northcutt, she did not seek medical treatment and the ex-wife never questioned the father regarding the allegation that he supposedly slapped Jack. In fact, she has NEVER stated any concerns to the father in regards to how he treated the children.
The ex-wife picked Jack up within 2 hours of the supposed slap. Jack had no marks and did not say anything about being slapped to his mother, despite the fact that he had never been struck or spanked in his life.
The ex-wife testified that Jack told her the next evening in a waiting room immediately before the secret therapy session. This therapy was a weekly session in which the kids were instructed to say terrible things about their father. The coaching was so obvious that the therapist testified on the father's behalf. The ex-wife's story changed multiple times as her testimony in the EPO hearing did not match the EPO Report or the CPS Complaint.
The ex-wife testified that Jack simply "blurted out what happened excitedly", she stated that he said he was smacked while telling her "about his day". Jack has never been spanked in his life and he simply "blurted" this out and did so "excitedly"....? Also the mother is unemployed and Jack was not at school that day, they were home together, why would she ask him about his day?
Despite the fact that the ex-wife's story grew to her being so concerned that Jack could have experienced a "concussion" due to the alleged slap, as she stated on recorded audio to Detective Northcutt, she did not seek medical treatment and the ex-wife never questioned the father regarding the allegation that he supposedly slapped Jack. In fact, she has NEVER stated any concerns to the father in regards to how he treated the children.
No texts
Despite testifying that she would only text with the father, the ex-wife could not present a single text message since the first child was born that indicated any questions or concerns regarding the treatment of the children by the father.
The ex-wife, along with the children who were being coached, presented dozens of supposed abusive or neglectful behaviors by the father. If any of these were true a mother would surely had expressed concern for her two small children. She never did. The father has every text message between he and the mother throughout the therapy sessions.
The ex-wife expressed concern to the therapist that the children were neglected by their father.
4/8/21. Jack told his therapist that his dad hardly spends time with him, would a mother not want to address this? She never did.
5/13/21. The mother and grandmother expressed great concern to the therapist regarding Adi being neglected by her dad.
That same day, 5-year-old Adi, without being asked by the therapist, told the therapist that 
Also that same day, 7-year-old Jack, without being asked by the therapist, was also concerned his little sister is 
Why would the the ex-wife NOT mention this neglect to the father? Notice how both children use the same term, "he just ignores her", one of many coaching examples. The father has photos and receipts for every visit with the children. Not one accusation in therapy matches the events of the previous visits.
The EPO report states that the mother is aware of ongoing verbal and mental abuse toward the children.
The children reported multiple instances of their father calling them terrible cuss words. This is something that a mother would definitely bring up with their dad, right? She never did.
In one of the worst acting performances ever, the ex-wife states that, "she just knows that there is something wrong" with the 5-year-old daughter. Adi was "scared", and had supposedly been "crying all day". Adi told the therapist it was because her dad had a called her a "bitch" 3 days prior, "but she hadn’t told her mom yet". Having a scared and crying 5-year-old, the mother obviously questioned the father about this, right? She never mentioned this "verbal abuse" to the father. Not one adult could testify to the father ever speaking harshly towards the children.
The ex-wife told the therapist that the father practically attempted to drown his daughter the day before.
The ex-wife informed the therapist that the father held the 5-year-old underwater at the clubhouse pool. In his session with the therapist, without being asked, the 7-year-old brother followed in lockstep and expressed his concern of how his dad treated Adi in the pool. The 5-year-old supposed drowning victim forgot the narrative and bragged about jumping off the diving board.
This allegation would seem pretty serious, why did the mother tell the therapist but never share her concerns with the father? Why did she let the children go out of state to 2 water parks just three weeks later with their father? In actuality, the children went to the pool with the father's girlfriend and her friends, the father was not at the pool.
2 adult witnesses have offered testimony to this fact.
Without being asked, but inspired by their mother, the children would tell the therapist bad things about their dad, every single session. Despite the mother being fully aware of these supposed abusive acts she never raised any concerns to the father. Why didn’t she?
5/13/21. The mother and grandmother expressed great concern to the therapist regarding Adi being neglected by her dad.
That same day, 5-year-old Adi, without being asked by the therapist, told the therapist that -
daddy ignores her
Also that same day, 7-year-old Jack, without being asked by the therapist, was also concerned his little sister is -
being ignored
Why would the the ex-wife NOT mention this neglect to the father? Notice how both children use the same term, "he just ignores her", one of many coaching examples. The father has photos and receipts for every visit with the children. Not one accusation in therapy matches the events of the previous visits.
The EPO report states that the mother is aware of ongoing verbal and mental abuse toward the children.
The children reported multiple instances of their father calling them terrible cuss words. This is something that a mother would definitely bring up with their dad, right? She never did.
In one of the worst acting performances ever, the ex-wife states that, "she just knows that there is something wrong" with the 5-year-old daughter. Adi was "scared", and had supposedly been "crying all day". Adi told the therapist it was because her dad had a called her a "bitch" 3 days prior, "but she hadn’t told her mom yet". Having a scared and crying 5-year-old, the mother obviously questioned the father about this, right? She never mentioned this "verbal abuse" to the father. Not one adult could testify to the father ever speaking harshly towards the children.
The ex-wife told the therapist that the father practically attempted to drown his daughter the day before.
The ex-wife informed the therapist that the father held the 5-year-old underwater at the clubhouse pool. In his session with the therapist, without being asked, the 7-year-old brother followed in lockstep and expressed his concern of how his dad treated Adi in the pool. The 5-year-old supposed drowning victim forgot the narrative and bragged about jumping off the diving board.
This allegation would seem pretty serious, why did the mother tell the therapist but never share her concerns with the father? Why did she let the children go out of state to 2 water parks just three weeks later with their father? In actuality, the children went to the pool with the father's girlfriend and her friends, the father was not at the pool.
2 adult witnesses have offered testimony to this fact.
Without being asked, but inspired by their mother, the children would tell the therapist bad things about their dad, every single session. Despite the mother being fully aware of these supposed abusive acts she never raised any concerns to the father. Why didn’t she?
Therapist Testimony
Therapist testimony refutes ex-wife’s claims
The ex-wife testified multiple times that that the father knew of the children's therapy prior to her allegation that he had struck the son. She also testified that the father's insurance was used to pay for the therapy. The therapist testified that both of these claims were false and that the ex-wife was emphatic that the father could not know about the therapy.
Therapy Intake Info was False
The ex-wife provided false reasons for putting the children in therapy: She stated that her and the father were in the process of divorcing.
They were divorced 3 years prior.
She told the therapist that she had full custody. This was to prevent the therapist from insisting on speaking with the father.
She has never had full custody.
She told the therapist that she had an active EPO on the father for abusing her.
She has never filed an EPO on the father for abusing her and this was months before the slap allegation.
Jack's Comments
Jack Can’t Remember
With his mother present Jack told his therapist, CPS, and Detective Northcutt that his father slapped him in the face.
Without his mother present the child could not remember how he was hit or where on his body that he had been hit.
Without his mother present the child could not remember how he was hit or where on his body that he had been hit.
Jack Told Truth
Jack was asked to tell Judge Isaac exactly what happened. He told the exact same set of events as his father and girlfriend testified to under oath.
He did not mention ever being hit, and when the judge reminded him that he had said he was hit, he couldn't get his story straight and began stuttering uncontrollably.
Watching Jack struggle reveals the true child abuse his mother and her attorney have committed in forcing the him to lie about his own father.
He did not mention ever being hit, and when the judge reminded him that he had said he was hit, he couldn't get his story straight and began stuttering uncontrollably.
Watching Jack struggle reveals the true child abuse his mother and her attorney have committed in forcing the him to lie about his own father.
Proven Lies
Refuted testimony
The ex-wife never expressed her concerns of abuse to the children's father. Despite the fact that she detailed the abuse to the therapist, CPS, the police, her testimony revealed why she never addressed any concerns to the father. There were none, because there was no abuse.
April 1, 2021. The ex-wife told the therapist that the father had been abusive to the children in the past.
August 5th & 6th, 2021. The ex-wife reported on the EPO that the father's abuse was "ongoing". She went into detail with CPS describing previous abuse to the children.
August 26, 2021. Two weeks later and under oath, she denied any previous abuse by the father. Without his mother present Jack told the Judge his dad had never hit him.
September 3rd, 2021. 7 days later, the ex-wife reverted back to the false allegations 8 days later. On a phone call with Detective Northcutt, of which she did not know was being recorded, she made statements of past abuse to the children forced Jack to create false incidents of past abuse by his dad.
April 1, 2021. The ex-wife told the therapist that the father had been abusive to the children in the past.
August 5th & 6th, 2021. The ex-wife reported on the EPO that the father's abuse was "ongoing". She went into detail with CPS describing previous abuse to the children.
August 26, 2021. Two weeks later and under oath, she denied any previous abuse by the father. Without his mother present Jack told the Judge his dad had never hit him.
September 3rd, 2021. 7 days later, the ex-wife reverted back to the false allegations 8 days later. On a phone call with Detective Northcutt, of which she did not know was being recorded, she made statements of past abuse to the children forced Jack to create false incidents of past abuse by his dad.
Previous False Accusations
The ex-wife fabricated the entire incident at Jeff Rubys. The father had not seen the children in almost 3 months and ran into her at the restaurant.
She was with a date and the father went to their table after a waitress, that knew them both, told him she was there. He approached the table, apologized for the intrusion and shook her date's hand, he asked if he could speak with the mother for a quick minute. The conversation was very brief, the mother was cordial and appeared a bit embarrassed regarding the mention of her keeping the children from their father.
She stated that the children did miss him and promised to let them visit him. The father thanked her and left them alone.
She and her date left prior to the father who did not see them leave. The father was NOT waiting for them outside, in fact she attempted to have the valet give her his vehicle. The valet refused and mentioned this in a sworn statement.
That night the father texted the ex-wife thanking her for talking to him. The next day they texted each other and set up a visitation day. One hour later he received the false allegations sent by her attorney to his. Several witnesses viewed the encounter and provided sworn statements, also of note, video from the restaurant security system was subpoenaed.
The following is the accusation by her attorney, sworn statements by witnesses, and the subpoena for video.
Jeff Ruby_s Accusation1
Hover over document and click on up/down arrows to view each page.
She was with a date and the father went to their table after a waitress, that knew them both, told him she was there. He approached the table, apologized for the intrusion and shook her date's hand, he asked if he could speak with the mother for a quick minute. The conversation was very brief, the mother was cordial and appeared a bit embarrassed regarding the mention of her keeping the children from their father.
She stated that the children did miss him and promised to let them visit him. The father thanked her and left them alone.
She and her date left prior to the father who did not see them leave. The father was NOT waiting for them outside, in fact she attempted to have the valet give her his vehicle. The valet refused and mentioned this in a sworn statement.
That night the father texted the ex-wife thanking her for talking to him. The next day they texted each other and set up a visitation day. One hour later he received the false allegations sent by her attorney to his. Several witnesses viewed the encounter and provided sworn statements, also of note, video from the restaurant security system was subpoenaed.
The following is the accusation by her attorney, sworn statements by witnesses, and the subpoena for video.
Jeff Ruby_s Accusation1
Hover over document and click on up/down arrows to view each page.
April 14th, 2019, prior to the Jeff Ruby's incident, the mother had ignored all texts and calls from the father for multiple weeks. She would disappear on his scheduled visitation days.
The father went to her home on April 19, 2021, his scheduled visitation day, and she was home, but would not allow him to see the children. She decided to use an altercation that the father had with the girlfriend as her excuse to keep the children from him, even though they were not involved.
The two talked for awhile but she refused to allow him to take, or even see the children. As he left he heard the children inside and loudly said, "Daddy loves you guys!". She replied, "Brian!!" and slammed the door."
She accused the father of her pushing her down to the ground and forcing his way inside the home.
Without the video the father would likely had been falsely arrested again. The father was finally able to have the mother served and the court forced the mother to allow visitation to resume.
The father went to her home on April 19, 2021, his scheduled visitation day, and she was home, but would not allow him to see the children. She decided to use an altercation that the father had with the girlfriend as her excuse to keep the children from him, even though they were not involved.
The two talked for awhile but she refused to allow him to take, or even see the children. As he left he heard the children inside and loudly said, "Daddy loves you guys!". She replied, "Brian!!" and slammed the door."
She accused the father of her pushing her down to the ground and forcing his way inside the home.
Without the video the father would likely had been falsely arrested again. The father was finally able to have the mother served and the court forced the mother to allow visitation to resume.
Less than 6 months after the divorce was final the mother wanted more money from the father. She blatantly lied about his desire to see the children and alleged that he had missed several visits. The visitation with the father was limited for a 2 week period due a major surgery the father had when he tore his bicep muscle. The children were small and he could not pick them up and carry them without assistance.
The father submitted the text messages between he and the mother regarding pick up and drop offs proved her accusation as false. In fact, these texts revealed that she cancelled his visitation multiple times in the short time frame.
False accusation by the ex-wife:
Response from the father:
Response 3-28-19 (4)
Full motion by the mother:
PRE_DV.Motion 3-18-19 (4)
To view the dozens of texts from the father requesting to see the children click here:
Texts from the father.
The father submitted the text messages between he and the mother regarding pick up and drop offs proved her accusation as false. In fact, these texts revealed that she cancelled his visitation multiple times in the short time frame.
False accusation by the ex-wife:
Response from the father:
Response 3-28-19 (4)
Full motion by the mother:
PRE_DV.Motion 3-18-19 (4)
To view the dozens of texts from the father requesting to see the children click here:
Texts from the father.
2019, revised motion, despite denying any abuse during the divorce mediation and an initial motion, the ex-wife stated that the father had always been abusive to her and she simply feared him so much that she was too scared to ever bring it up. These accusations were alleged in a revised motion after a complaint from an ex-girlfriend of the father. The mother has utilized the girlfriend's complaint as the basis of her entire case.
According to this accusation the ex-wife should be able to list multiple instances of abuse and intimidation. But she can't, this was a lie.
April 2019, in the video recorded discussion between the father and the ex-wife regarding the false allegation of forced entry, he made the comment, "I have never touched you or the children", she agreed.
August 2021, while testifying at the DVO Hearing, the ex-wife was asked to detail all the abuse she suffered from the father. She stated that there was one incident in the 8 years they were together in which the father physically tried to take her phone from her, but there were no injuries.
One in instance in 8 years, and even that was untrue. There was a scuffle for the phone, but the father had her phone and that is when he realized she had been cheating for quite some time. She tried to take the phone from him and lunged over the father's shoulder who was sitting on the edge of the bed. After they both fell to the floor the father said,"you are going to cheat on me and then attack me?"
She lied about this encounter to 3 people, when the father confronted her in regards to her lie that he was the one that initiated the contact, she said that she was simply protecting herself in case it came up in a divorce hearing.
These are the texts at the time discussing her reasoning for lying in order protect herself regarding the phone incident.
According to this accusation the ex-wife should be able to list multiple instances of abuse and intimidation. But she can't, this was a lie.
April 2019, in the video recorded discussion between the father and the ex-wife regarding the false allegation of forced entry, he made the comment, "I have never touched you or the children", she agreed.
August 2021, while testifying at the DVO Hearing, the ex-wife was asked to detail all the abuse she suffered from the father. She stated that there was one incident in the 8 years they were together in which the father physically tried to take her phone from her, but there were no injuries.
One in instance in 8 years, and even that was untrue. There was a scuffle for the phone, but the father had her phone and that is when he realized she had been cheating for quite some time. She tried to take the phone from him and lunged over the father's shoulder who was sitting on the edge of the bed. After they both fell to the floor the father said,"you are going to cheat on me and then attack me?"
She lied about this encounter to 3 people, when the father confronted her in regards to her lie that he was the one that initiated the contact, she said that she was simply protecting herself in case it came up in a divorce hearing.
These are the texts at the time discussing her reasoning for lying in order protect herself regarding the phone incident.
Lies & Alienation
False Testimony
Testimony by the ex-wife proven to be false:
The ex-wife's drug usage has been ongoing since before she quit high school. She uses drugs around the children. She denied her drug usage under oath but images, video and other evidence proved otherwise.
The ex-wife generates income as an escort on multiple sugar daddy websites, only fans, and online porn.
This is an instagram image from her account promoting her latest porn on a website "BlackedRaw". The theme is "black dicks for white chicks". (Warning: Adult Content https://www.blackedraw.com/)
These are 2 of the sites in which she had profiles to advertise her escort services. She travels to many states and even other countries. She says she is "modeling" but cannot produce income verification from agencies or clients.
These are 2 of the sites in which she had profiles to advertise her escort services. She travels to many states and even other countries. She says she is "modeling" but cannot produce income verification from agencies or clients.
The ex-wife testified under oath that she did not have an "Only Fans" site.
She does have her own Only Fans account, as well as 3 other knock off sites.
The ex-wife testified under oath that her doctor approved her drug usage while pregnant.
Dr. Parrott, Central Baptist Hospital, emphatically denied this statement. In fact, his office reported her drug usage to CPS at the time.
The 7-year-old told the FOC that his father has "mental issues".
When asked if she told the child this, the ex-wife denied the accusation. Her reasoning for Jack making this statement about his father's "mental issues", is that he reads the DSM-5, an advanced guide for psychiatrists and psychologists.
After the children were taken from their father and his visits were supervised twice monthly for only 55 minutes, the children would bring art they had made for him. Instead of writing "To Daddy", they wrote "To Brian", and said their mom told them to do this and call him by his name.
The mother testified that the 5 and 7-year-old made this decision on their own.
The ex-wife stated that her sole reason for wanting school custody was that she wanted to avoid arguing over big decisions, like the children's school.
She implied that she was forced to "acquiesce" reluctantly as to where the children attend school. She also stated that there were several arguments about this but no texts... this after her testimony that she will only text with the father. She lies so often she cannot keep her stories straight.
She never had to "acquiesce", this is a lie and these text messages prove that the father attempted to discuss school with her and she informed him that she had already enrolled the children in her school of choice.
The ex-wife expressed her displeasure of being in KY and desire to move away to multiple people, but also in public on podcasts and video.
In one of her many lies under oath she stated that she never expressed interest in moving, which was debunked, by her own words, again. She has now asked the court to let her move the children out of state.
The ex-wife claimed that the video of her discussing her drug usage was not real and simply acting. The truth is, this video is from a real dating show, no acting, no scripts. Instagram confirmed that the people participating were not actors.
/>
The ex-wife herself admits that she is not acting and that there are no scripts. She actually mentions she is participating looking for true love.
/>The ex-wife herself admits that she is not acting and that there are no scripts. She actually mentions she is participating looking for true love.
Textbook Alienation
Textbook Alienation Tactics by the Mother
June 7, 2022, Friend of the Court (FOC) Report:
- The ex-wife told the children that their father was not present at their births. He had to show them photos.
- The ex-wife told the children that their father had “mental issues”.
- The ex-wife told the children that the father was always angry.
- The ex-wife told the children the father did not love them.
- The ex-wife told the children that their father had “mental issues”.
- The ex-wife told the children that the father was always angry.
- The ex-wife told the children the father did not love them.
- Ex-wife denied 31 visits to the father prior to the current false allegation.
- Immediately after the latest allegation, the children were not allowed to see their father for 2 months until supervised visitation was ordered.
- The ex-wife waited over a month before conducting her interview with Greenhouse which was required before visitation could begin for the father.
- The ex-wife delayed the initial visitation for 2 weeks after the interview.
- The ex-wife has cancelled several supervised visits.
- Immediately after the latest allegation, the children were not allowed to see their father for 2 months until supervised visitation was ordered.
- The ex-wife waited over a month before conducting her interview with Greenhouse which was required before visitation could begin for the father.
- The ex-wife delayed the initial visitation for 2 weeks after the interview.
- The ex-wife has cancelled several supervised visits.
- Therapy notes and the FOC Report have several instances of the children praising their mom as great and without flaw, they say the opposite of their dad.
- The mother told the children that the father was always angry and inappropriate.
- The therapist and FOC noted several instances of the children speaking on adult topics regarding their parents and the court proceedings.
- The therapist and FOC noted several instances of the children speaking on adult topics regarding their parents and the court proceedings.
The ex-wife attempted to change the children's last name to hers.
Immediately after the divorce the ex-wife continuously attempted to persuade the children that their last name was now Tuveson instead of Poe. This is a video of the young daughter stating her name is Tuveson instead of Poe.
Immediately after the divorce the ex-wife continuously attempted to persuade the children that their last name was now Tuveson instead of Poe. This is a video of the young daughter stating her name is Tuveson instead of Poe.
The therapist testified that the ex-wife was very clear that the father could not know about the children's therapy and alleged the father would be more violent and abusive if he found out. Of course that allegation proved to be another lie, but she absolutely did not want the father to know about the therapy.
- Allegations of past and current abuse to the children to the children's therapist, CPS, and the police.
- Reports of neglect by the father, from the mother, to the children’s therapist.
- 2019 visitation lie
- Jeff Ruby’s lie
- Forced entry lie
- Reports of neglect by the father, from the mother, to the children’s therapist.
- 2019 visitation lie
- Jeff Ruby’s lie
- Forced entry lie
- She made Jack quit Tball.
- She made Jack quit Karate.
- Jack was kicked out of his “Ninja Class” because his mother refused to take him.
- She made Adi quit gymnastics.
- She made Jack quit Karate.
- Jack was kicked out of his “Ninja Class” because his mother refused to take him.
- She made Adi quit gymnastics.
Jack informed the Judge that his therapy was a secret and that his did couldn’t know about the therapy "until everything is fixed".
- Referred to their father on a 1st name basis.
- Fabricated abuse accusations about their dad.
- Fabricated abuse accusations about their dad.
FOC Report; both children mentioned being fearful of their dad but they were not sure why.
Removed the father from all online access to children's school records. Removed the father and and grandparents as emergency contacts and eligible pickup and drop off drivers.
The children use words that are not in a young child's vocabulary, such as inappropriate, when talking about their father to the therapist and FOC. They state that their dad "always breaks the rules".
Children refer to father as "Brian", instead of "dad" during supervised visitation and on artwork. The children told the father that the mother told them to call him by his first name. The mother says that the young children just decided to do it on their own.
