Children’s Therapy


Therapy was a ploy and part of the strategy.

Everything about the therapy was a lie.

The ex-wife stated that she and the father were currently going through a divorce. They had been divorced for 3 years. The ex-wife also indicated that she had full custody, they have always had joint custody.



The children were very young at the time of the divorce, Adi has no recollection and Jack has few memories prior to the divorce, thus Jack did not have these issues, nor did he have to be treated for them. The ex-wife forced this on the children.

The ex-wife indicated that she had a current DVO on the father. The ex-wife has never filed a DVO on the father against her and there was no DVO at that time.



The ex-wife indicated that the father was abusive and violent towards the children and if he found out about the therapy, he would be even more belligerent and abusive. The ex-wife later testified that the father had never been violent or abusive to the children.

The ex-wife lied to the court stating that the father knew of the children’s therapy and that his insurance was used to pay for the therapy.


Concerning issues

10/14/21. On Jack’s last session the therapist noted that Jack could not relax was having trouble sleeping. Therapist discussed medication for Jack.

Jack also gained several pounds over the next few months after he was forced to lie about his father.

Jack’s emotional and mental state has obviously deteriorated due to his mother forcing him to participate in her depraved strategy. Despite Jack’s obvious decline his mother pulled him from therapy as soon as supervised visitation with his father began.


The ex-wife was instructed to wait at least 18 months before filing for custody after her initial failed attempt in 2019. The children’s therapy began 20 months later.

Corey Lee 1.5 The ex-wife immediately pulled the children out of therapy the week after the father’s supervised visitation began.

How does this make sense? According to the mother’s testimony the father had never been abusive to the children, yet she had them in therapy for months prior to the false slap accusation. Yet after she makes the claim the father has slapped Jack and they are removed from from their father for the first time in their lives, the ex-wife believes the children are just fine and not in any need of therapy?

The ex-wife used the therapy as a tool in her quest for custody. It is a textbook procedure of legitimate parental alienation.


 

Despite the fact that the children were seen individually and despite the therapist never asking about their father, each child immediately offered negative comments about the father as the only subject matter discussed in every session for the entire 7 months of therapy. The father’s visitation schedule was only 2 nights a week. No discussion of life at moms, school, or friends/neighborhood.

These are some of the most obvious examples of the 5 and 7-year-old’s shared narratives despite not being asked:

4/15/2021 – Dad calls them bad names.
4/22/2021 – Scared of dad.
5/6/2021 – Dad cusses.
5/13/2021 – Dad ignores Adi.
9/2/2021 – Family is changing.
10/7/2021 – 1st supervised visit with dad ok because someone else was there.
The ex-wife continuously commented to the therapist regarding the father and many times had the children restate her “concerns” in their sessions, without them being asked by the therapist.

4/22/2021 Adi – mom knows something

5/6/2021 Mom and grandma Dad neglects Adi

5/27/2021 she said Jack texted his mom

6/24. mom pool

10/7 kids nervous
How does this make sense? According to the mother’s testimony the father had never been abusive to the children, yet she had them in therapy for months. After she claimed the father slapped Jack and their father was taken from them the ex-wife no longer thinks the children need therapy?


Keep in mind these facts:
– The children are seen separately.
– The children were not asked about their father.
– The children are only 7 and 5-years-old

10/7/21
Jack: (Seeing his dad at supervised visitation) “I guess it will be ok, especially with someone there”
Adi: “there is someone in the room he is nicer”

9/2/2021
Jack: “he is sad and his family is changing, he feels ok”
Adi: “states that her family is changing, but it’s ok.

5/13/2021
Jack: “he is treated better by his dad than Adi, he just ignores her”
Adi: “dad treats her differently, he just ignores her”

On 5/6, the mother and grandmother informed the therapist that the father had been neglecting Adi.

5/6/2021
Jack: “father is mean and cusses all the time”
Adi: “dad calls her bad words when he is mad”

4/22/2021
Jack: “afraid of his dad if he is in a bad mood”
Adi: “sad and scared of her dad”

4/15/2021
Jack: “dad always calls him bad names”
Adi: “dad calls Jack names”

6/24/2021 pool

9/9/2021 Jack – dad does thing he aint supposed to do all the time

10/21/2021 Adi – dad inapprorpriate

4/15. (4/8 adi likes dad, 4/22 dad treats jack better) why would Adi even mention this

Therapy entries did not match reality

5/6/201, the ex-wife and grandmother informed the therapist that the father was neglecting his 5-year-old daughter, Adi.



The father has photos and receipts of every visit with the children. The two visits prior to this therapy session in which he was accused of neglect couldn’t be further from the truth. This accusation is a perfect example of the dishonesty and lies the mother has put upon the court.

These are the activities the father participated in with his children on those two visits:

April 30th, the father took the children and their cousins to the clubhouse park and food trucks. They then had dessert at Mad Scoops Ice Cream. The cousins stayed for a sleep over and the children watched movies and popped popcorn.

May 1st, the father surprised Adi with a new “Princess Dress” and tickets to Disney on Ice Princesses that afternoon. After the show the father took the children to Sky Zone and Red Robin.

May 4th, the family had a nerf gun competition, boys vs girls.

May 5th, the father and Adi had a Cinco de Mayo lunch party. The father took Adi shopping so she could pick out Mother’s Day presents for her mother and grandmother. The same 2 that were falsely accusing the father and forcing the children to lie. He took Adi to Bath & Body Works (grandmother’s present), Lush (mother’s present) and Dollar Tree (materials for Adi to create cards).

The photos are evidence of the activities of those two visits and the text messages are those between the father and the ex-wife between the visits and the therapy session. She never mentions her concern of Adi’s neglect, in fact she has never voiced concerns regarding the father’s treatment of the children. The text messages reveal the naive father informing the ex-wife that he had purchased the children’s school photos for her.


The father has photos, videos and receipts of every visit with the children. The activities do not match the false accusations by the children or their mother.

Questionable Entries

Play Therapy

The children’s therapist had issues with the children’s questionable comments during the discussion part of therapy, however, she stated that the truth usually comes out during the play therapy portion of the session.  During play therapy,  children create scenarios with toys and explain them.  Jack and Adi’s play therapy sessions were extremely revealing when set against the current happenings and the corresponding dates of the custody situation.

5/13 Jack introduces a dragon, controlled by a king, fighting skeleton warriors.
5/27 Jack states a dragon is fighting multiple skeletons.
6/17 Jack identifies himself as the dragon.
8/12 Jack states that he is going to talk to the judge about how daddy is treating them.

During the session Jack builds a house in the sand and places the skeleton inside. He states that the skeleton was the original owner of the dragon. The skeleton has died, and the dragon turned evil. That is when the wizard took over him and used him for his evil plans.

Jack Theory:

Jack states he is the dragon. Dad is the skeleton. Mom is the king and wizard.

Throughout the therapy Jack talks of fighting the skeleton. Did he envision the lies he told each week about his father as fighting him?

At the end Jack reveals that the skeleton is the dragon’s original owner. Jack is daddy’s boy, is Dad his original owner?

The dragon (Jack) is controlled by the King (Mom) and fights the skeleton (Dad).

The day Jack tells the therapist he is going to talk to the judge about his father. He also states that the skeleton (Dad) was the dragon’s original owner and has died. The dragon is now evil, and the wizard had taken over him and used him for his evil plans.

Is Jack expressing self-guilt for betraying his father, and is his mother controlling him?

Jack Play Therapy

Adi details 2 separate storylines.
One with good and evil kings and queens, and with a lion. She also is observed refusing to connect the circle of a train track she has built.

4/29 Adi creates a good pair and evil pair of kings and queens. She tells the story of how the evil pair are trying to take over the world and the good pair is trying to stop them.
She then asks why do parents sleep in the same bed? Daddy and girlfriend sleep in the same bed, mommy just sleeps by herself. 5/6 Adi states that daddies and mommies sleep in the same bed. She introduces a daughter who sleeps in the small bed.
5/13 Adi makes a world where the king and queen are good, but the prince and princess are evil and trying to take over the world. She states they are going to take over the world and everything will be bad.
5/27 Adi added a daughter to the good king & queen, but the daughter was buried in the snow. She then states that the evil couple was also buried in the snow and died.
9/16 Adi picks out the king and queen and prince and princess and places them in the box. The bad figures are buried, and the good figures walk away. As of this date the father hasn’t seen the children or had any contact for 5 weeks.
Theory 1
Good pair of king and queen are dad and his girlfriend. Evil pair trying to take over the world are mom and grandmother. Good king and queen are the parents. Adi is the daughter and the princess. Jack is the prince. The prince and princess are evil and trying to take over the world, just like the evil king and queen. They are going to take over the world and everything will be bad. The children will turn against dad and things will be bad.

She states the evil king and queen were buried in the snow and died, but the daughter was also buried with them. Adi later buries the princess again, this time the prince is buries as well, while the good king and queen walk away. The children have joined their mother and grandmother in harming their dad. He is no longer a major part of their life.

6/17 Adi is playing with a lion and tells him she will make food for him. However, when she makes the food, she refuses to give any to the lion stating he cannot have the food. 8/12 Adi promises she will fix the lion food and he will get to eat. He just has to pay her all his money, not her rule but her boss’. 8/19 Adi was able to see her dad for the first time in 2 weeks prior to this session. This time Adi made the lion food and let him eat.

Theory 2
Adaline introduces a lion who represents her dad. She tells the lion she will feed him but when she makes the food, she states he cannot have the food. She again promises to make food for the lion, but he must pay all his money to her. The children’s mother constantly discusses the lack of money she has, and that dad does not give her enough. Adi tells the lion it is not her rule but the boss’ (mom).

Adi was able to see her dad for the first time in 2 weeks and the very next session she let the lion eat. Theory 3:
10/21 While playing with train tracks, she made a circular track but would not connect it. Several times she had a piece in her to connect but would lay it to the side. At this date Adi has seen her dad once, for one hour, in the last 8 weeks. The suggestion is that her life is missing a connection, possibly her daddy.

Adi1 Play Therapy

Adi2 Play Therapy