Obvious evidence exists that reveal this entire case is a premeditated plan.
– The ex-wife’s own words while being recorded and Jack’s statement to Judge Isaac reveal a plan is in place.
– The timeline of events clearly reveals events that are not simply coincidental.
– The ex-wife followed the time frame instructions of her previous attorney to put the custody strategy in motion.
– The ex-wife accused the father of slapping Jack the day after he found out about the children’s therapy.
– The ex-wife took the children out of therapy the week supervised visitation began with the father.
– The ex-wife was alienated from her father by her her mother.
This was a premeditated plan
This was a textbook alienation strategy.
The ex-wife and Jack provide subtle hints with specific comments.
Also, the timing of specific events cannot be ignored:
In 2019, after her failed attempt to falsely accuse the father of not wanting to see the children, the ex-wife is instructed to wait the required 2 years to file for custody. In April of 2021 she began the children’s secret therapy.
August 4, 2021, Jack tells his father about his therapy and that it was a secret. The very next day the ex-wife accused the father of slapping Jack.
October 14th, 2021, the ex-wife abruptly stopped the children’s therapy immediately after the first supervised visit the children had with their father.

The most common method for a parent to encourage a child to lie about the other is to use a fear tactic. The mother revealed that “fear” in her phone call with Detective Northcutt. This threat was never mentioned in court documents or testimony.
The therapist noted the obvious coaching and simply did not believe the allegations against the father.
The children’s therapy was a complete sham. The coaching was so obvious that the therapist testified for the father and the ex-wife’s own attorney attempted to have the therapy notes excluded from the hearing.
Other than the obvious lies by the mother in setting up the therapy, the sessions were littered with signs of obvious coaching.
Despite never being asked their about their father, the only subject that the children would mention was bad things about their dad. The therapist would ask how their week went and the children never discussed school, their friends, or anyone else other than a a totally fabricated story about their father.
Despite being seen separately the children repeated the exact same talking points 7 times out of 19 visits.
Despite being seen separately the children would use the exact same phrasing such as; 3pm – Jack states he is sad, and his family is changing, he’s ok. 4pm – Adi says her family is changing, she is sad, but it’s ok.
The 5-year-old daughter would use large words such as, “daddy is always doing things that are inappropriate”.
The 7-year-old son would discuss what he was going to tell the judge when he gets to meet her.
The scariest part of this evil strategy is the impact it has on the children. In the last therapy session, the therapist suggested medication for Jack’s anxiety and depression.
Here are before and after photos of the children. The photo with their father was a week before the false allegation and arrest took them away from him. The other is only a few months later. Jack was an emotional wreck and experienced unhealthy weight gain. The therapist suggested medication for Jack as his depression and anxiety were increasing. This is child abuse:
The issues with the children are noted on these PDFs.
1. Introduction and concerns regarding the false intake and coaching.
2. The children’s play therapy in which the therapist derived the truth from the children.
3. The questionable entries matched with every visit prior to each session.
Introduction and Concerns (1)Hover over document and click on up/down arrows to view each page.
Play TherapyHover over document and click on up/down arrows to view each page.
Questionable EntriesHover over document and click on up/down arrows to view each page.


In 2011, the ex-wife moved to Lexington from Atlanta to be with the father. Throughout the marriage she pressed for him to move away from KY.
After the divorce she expressed her desire to move and set up a long-distance visitation schedule with the father. He had joint custody and refused the idea unless he could keep the children during the school year.
The ex-wife expressed her displeasure of being in KY and desire to move away to multiple people, but also in public on podcasts and video.
In one of her many lies under oath she stated that she never expressed interest in moving, which was debunked, by her own words, again.