April 1, 2021. The ex-wife told the therapist that the father had been abusive to the children in the past.

August 5th & 6th, 2021. The ex-wife reported on the EPO that the father’s abuse was “ongoing”. She went into detail with CPS describing previous abuse to the children.

August 26, 2021. Under oath she denied any previous abuse by the father. Without his mother present Jack told the Judge his dad had never hit him.

September 3rd, 2021. The ex-wife reverted back to the false allegations 8 days later. In a phone call with Detective Northcutt, she forced Jack to create false incidents of past abuse by his dad.

Despite telling his therapist and CPS, in detail, how he he was slapped in the face and knocked to the ground, Jack could not remember how and where on his body that his dad supposedly hit him. Jack’s mom was by his side when talking to the therapist and CPS, she was not present when Jack talked to the judge. Jack also could not remember where on his body that he was hit when questioned by the FOC at his school without his mother present.

After Jack could not remember how or where his dad had supposedly hit him, the judge asked Jack to tell her what happened.

Jack proceeded to describe the incident exactly as had been testified by the witness, Lexi Bender, and his father. Jack did not say he was slapped, because he wasn’t.

The judge reminded him of the accusation and Jack immediately began stuttering, he could not process the lie his mother had forced him to say, and he immediately changed the subject to his barber. This is the real child abuse.

This explanation makes no sense.

Jack’s mother picked him up less than 2 hours after the supposed slap occurred, but Jack did not tell her….?

Jack had no marks or bruises.

Jack did not inform her of the slap until he was at the therapist office. The same secret therapy where he and his sister were forced to create other false accusations about their dad at every single visit. The coaching was so obvious that the therapist testified for the father at the custody hearing.

As his mother and Jack both testified, he had never been hit before. Yet he “excitedly” told her he was slapped to the ground the previous day?

He told her this when she asked about his day? He simply blurted it out excitedly? His mother is unemployed, and was with Jack the entire day, yet she asked a 7-year-old about his day?

This story has changed multiple times, in the EPO and CPS report versus her testimony in the EPO hearing.

Also, the mother never asked the father about the slap. What mother doesn’t question her 7-year-old being slapped in the face? In fact, she has never asked him or expressed any concern regarding his treatment to the children, ever.

The mother continuously corrects Jack about the facts and time frames of events that supposedly occurred, of which she was not present, and that she testified to in court as having never happened.
Her coaching on these phone calls parallel the coaching identified by the children’s therapist.

In regards to the alleged abuse by his father, Detective Northcutt always asked Jack in what appears to be a leading manner. This might not be the best process to ascertain the truth from a 7-year-old, assuming that obtaining the truth is the objective.

Detective Northcutt appears to enlist the mother in helping to create a timeline to add more charges against the father.

Is a phone call with a 7-year-old and an ex-wife, obviously coaching the child, considered a comprehensive investigation? Is CPS writing up a report without any investigation enough to rely on to make an arrest? This was an incident with an adult witness that debunked the accusation and no marks or bruises exist on the child. This arrest actually ruined an innocent man’s life in which he lost funding for his business and his home went into foreclosure.


CPS and the District Attorneys office reviewed the evidence, spoke with parties, and after viewing all of the contradictions and obvious coaching they were in agreement as to the father’s innocence.

CPS declared the accusations as unsubstantiated and the DA’s office immediately dropped all charges against the father.

This was a textbook alienation strategy. The ex-wife and Jack provide subtle hints with specific comments.


Also, the timing of specific events cannot be ignored:
In 2019, after her failed attempt to falsely accuse the father of not wanting to see the children, the ex-wife is instructed to wait the required 2 years to file for custody. In April of 2021 she began the children’s secret therapy.

August 4, 2021, Jack tells his father about his therapy and that it was a secret. The very next day the ex-wife accused the father of slapping Jack.

October 14th, 2021, the ex-wife abruptly stopped the children’s therapy immediately after the first supervised visit the children had with their father.

The most common method for a parent to encourage a child to lie about the other is to use a fear tactic. The mother revealed that “fear” in her phone call with Detective Northcutt. This threat was never mentioned in court documents or testimony.



The therapist noted the obvious coaching and simply did not believe the allegations against the father.



The children’s therapy was a complete sham. The coaching was so obvious that the therapist testified for the father and the ex-wife’s own attorney attempted to have the therapy notes excluded from the hearing.



Other than the obvious lies by the mother in setting up the therapy, the sessions were littered with signs of obvious coaching.
Despite never being asked their about their father, the only subject that the children would mention was bad things about their dad. The therapist would ask how their week went and the children never discussed school, their friends, or anyone else other than a a totally fabricated story about their father.

Despite being seen separately the children repeated the exact same talking points 7 times out of 19 visits.
Despite being seen separately the children would use the exact same phrasing such as; 3pm – Jack states he is sad, and his family is changing, he’s ok. 4pm – Adi says her family is changing, she is sad, but it’s ok.
The 5-year-old daughter would use large words such as, “daddy is always doing things that are inappropriate”.
The 7-year-old son would discuss what he was going to tell the judge when he gets to meet her.

The scariest part of this evil strategy is the impact it has on the children. In the last therapy session, the therapist suggested medication for Jack’s anxiety and depression.
Here are before and after photos of the children. The photo with their father was a week before the false allegation and arrest took them away from him. The other is only a few months later. Jack was an emotional wreck and experienced unhealthy weight gain. The therapist suggested medication for Jack as his depression and anxiety were increasing. This is child abuse:


The issues with the children are noted on these PDFs.
1. Introduction and concerns regarding the false intake and coaching.
2. The children’s play therapy in which the therapist derived the truth from the children.
3. The questionable entries matched with every visit prior to each session.
Introduction and Concerns (1)
Hover over document and click on up/down arrows to view each page. Play Therapy
Hover over document and click on up/down arrows to view each page. Questionable EntriesHover over document and click on up/down arrows to view each page.

In 2011, the ex-wife moved to Lexington from Atlanta to be with the father. Throughout the marriage she pressed for him to move away from KY.

After the divorce she expressed her desire to move and set up a long-distance visitation schedule with the father. He had joint custody and refused the idea unless he could keep the children during the school year.

The ex-wife expressed her displeasure of being in KY and desire to move away to multiple people, but also in public on podcasts and video.

In one of her many lies under oath she stated that she never expressed interest in moving, which was debunked, by her own words, again.

The ex-wife’s drug usage has been ongoing since before she quit high school. She uses drugs around the children. She denied her drug usage under oath but images, video and other evidence proved otherwise.

The ex-wife generates income as an escort on multiple sugar daddy websites, only fans, and online porn.

This is an instagram image from her account promoting her latest porn on a website “BlackedRaw”. The theme is “black dicks for white chicks”.
(Warning: Adult Content https://www.blackedraw.com/)



These are 2 of the sites in which she had profiles to advertise her escort services. She travels to many states and even other countries. She says she is “modeling” but cannot produce income verification from agencies or clients.

The ex-wife testified under oath that she did not have an “Only Fans” site.
She does have her own Only Fans account, as well as 3 other knock off sites.

The ex-wife testified under oath that her doctor approved her drug usage while pregnant.
Dr. Parrott, Central Baptist Hospital, emphatically denied this statement. In fact, his office reported her drug usage to CPS at the time.

The 7-year-old told the FOC that his father has “mental issues”.

When asked if she told the child this, the ex-wife denied the accusation. Her reasoning for Jack making this statement about his father’s “mental issues”, is that he reads the DSM-5, an advanced guide for psychiatrists and psychologists.

After the children were taken from their father and his visits were supervised twice monthly for only 55 minutes, the children would bring art they had made for him. Instead of writing “To Daddy”, they wrote “To Brian”, and said their mom told them to do this and call him by his name.

The mother testified that the 5 and 7-year-old made this decision on their own.

The ex-wife stated that her sole reason for wanting school custody was that she wanted to avoid arguing over big decisions, like the children’s school.
She implied that she was forced to “acquiesce” reluctantly as to where the children attend school. She also stated that there were several arguments about this but no texts… this after her testimony that she will only text with the father. She lies so often she cannot keep her stories straight.


She never had to “acquiesce”, this is a lie and these text messages prove that the father attempted to discuss school with her and she informed him that she had already enrolled the children in her school of choice.

The ex-wife expressed her displeasure of being in KY and desire to move away to multiple people, but also in public on podcasts and video.

In one of her many lies under oath she stated that she never expressed interest in moving, which was debunked, by her own words, again. She has now asked the court to let her move the children out of state.

The ex-wife claimed that the video of her discussing her drug usage was not real and simply acting. The truth is, this video is from a real dating show, no acting, no scripts. Instagram confirmed that the people participating were not actors.



/>

The ex-wife herself admits that she is not acting and that there are no scripts. She actually mentions she is participating looking for true love.