Several concerns exist with Judge Isaacs’ comments, rulings, and lack of concern regarding obvious red flags during the DVO hearing.
The therapist initiated the abuse claim. The ex-wife stated on the EPO, and to CPS, that Jack told the therapist about the allegation against the father. When opposing counsel objected, the ex-wife changed the story and testified that Jack told her, not the therapist.
Judge Isaacs prevented the father from facing his official accuser.
Judge Isaacs prevented the father from facing his official accuser.
The ex-wife told the children’s therapist that the father was abusive to the children. She stated that the abuse was ongoing. She detailed multiple abusive events to CPS.
Under oath, the ex-wife testified that the father had never been abusive to the children.
Under oath, the ex-wife testified that the father had never been abusive to the children.
Judge Isaac ordered the father’s attorney to hold all objections until the end of the hearing.
Without his mother present, Jack could not remember how or where he had been hit. Just a few days earlier he had told his therapist and CPS, in detail, how his dad supposedly slapped him, with his mother by his side.
Jack’s version of events did not include him being slapped and matched the testimony of his father and girlfriend who witnessed the incident. Judge Isaacs dismissed the struggle Jack had stuttering uncontrollably when she asked him about being slapped after he did not mention it when he told the truth about the events.
Jack stated to Judge Isaacs that things would be better if his dad knew more about the therapy, that his dad just found out, that he couldn’t tell him until things are “fixed”.
Jack stated that he could not remember how or where his father supposedly slapped him.
Jack denied any previous abuse from his father, and then said he might of hit me…
Jack stuttered uncontrollably when Judge Isaacs attempted to compel him to say his father slapped him.
If Jack is credible then so is the only adult witness, as both described the same events.
Jack denied any previous abuse from his father, and then said he might of hit me…
Jack stuttered uncontrollably when Judge Isaacs attempted to compel him to say his father slapped him.
If Jack is credible then so is the only adult witness, as both described the same events.
Judge Isaacs stated clearly that a video from an incident the father had with a girlfriend 5 years ago, in which the children were not involved, convinced her that the father had slapped his son.
No material evidence was provided to the court that incremented the father in any way. The allegation by an ex-wife seeking custody ,who wasn’t present, and the confused remarks of a 7-year-old, coached by a narcissistic mother, was the only evidence offered against the father.