The ex-wife has a history of lying. Two previous attorneys moved on from her due to her dishonesty.
Testimony by the ex-wife proven to be false:
The ex-wife’s drug usage has been ongoing since before she quit high school. She uses drugs around the children. She denied her drug usage under oath but images, video and other evidence proved otherwise.
The ex-wife generates income as an escort on multiple sugar daddy websites, only fans, and online porn.
This is an instagram image from her account promoting her latest porn on a website “BlackedRaw”. The theme is “black dicks for white chicks”. (Warning: Adult Content https://www.blackedraw.com/)
These are 2 of the sites in which she had profiles to advertise her escort services. She travels to many states and even other countries. She says she is “modeling” but cannot produce income verification from agencies or clients.



The ex-wife testified under oath that she did not have an “Only Fans” site.
She does have her own Only Fans account, as well as 3 other knock off sites.




The ex-wife testified under oath that her doctor approved her drug usage while pregnant.
Dr. Parrott, Central Baptist Hospital, emphatically denied this statement. In fact, his office reported her drug usage to CPS at the time.
The 7-year-old told the FOC that his father has “mental issues”.
When asked if she told the child this, the ex-wife denied the accusation. Her reasoning for Jack making this statement about his father’s “mental issues”, is that he reads the DSM-5, an advanced guide for psychiatrists and psychologists.
After the children were taken from their father and his visits were supervised twice monthly for only 55 minutes, the children would bring art they had made for him. Instead of writing “To Daddy”, they wrote “To Brian”, and said their mom told them to do this and call him by his name.
The mother testified that the 5 and 7-year-old made this decision on their own.


The ex-wife stated that her sole reason for wanting school custody was that she wanted to avoid arguing over big decisions, like the children’s school.
She implied that she was forced to “acquiesce” reluctantly as to where the children attend school. She also stated that there were several arguments about this but no texts… this after her testimony that she will only text with the father. She lies so often she cannot keep her stories straight.
She never had to “acquiesce”, this is a lie and these text messages prove that the father attempted to discuss school with her and she informed him that she had already enrolled the children in her school of choice.

The ex-wife expressed her displeasure of being in KY and desire to move away to multiple people, but also in public on podcasts and video.
In one of her many lies under oath she stated that she never expressed interest in moving, which was debunked, by her own words, again. She has now asked the court to let her move the children out of state.
The ex-wife claimed that the video of her discussing her drug usage was not real and simply acting. The truth is, this video is from a real dating show, no acting, no scripts. Instagram confirmed that the people participating were not actors.
/>
The ex-wife herself admits that she is not acting and that there are no scripts. She actually mentions she is participating looking for true love.

The ex-wife herself admits that she is not acting and that there are no scripts. She actually mentions she is participating looking for true love.